Hematodinium sp.

Today's parasite, Hematodinium sp., infects blue crabs and causes a disease known as "bitter crab". While the name may sound just slightly nauseating for your palate, for the afflicted crabs, its symptom is down right horrific. The parasite causes the crab's hepatopancreas (equivalent of our liver and pancreas) to malfunction, it starts suffocating, and its muscles eventually dissolve within its exoskeleton. Crabs that are experimentally infected start dying about 2 weeks after initial exposure, and this deadly parasite may have even contributed to the recent decline of blue crabs in Chesapeake Bay.

Hematodinium and related species are dinoflagellates, and while most dinoflagellate are free-living, this species belongs to a group which have evolved to be parasites, with many different species infecting a wide variety of hosts. While several different stages of the parasite have been isolated from the blood of infected crabs, little is known about how they are transmitted between hosts, nor the inner life of those different stages in the hosts. Because many parasites live enclosed within the body of their hosts, it is almost impossible to directly observe how they live and grow the way you might be able to observe a fish or a bird. Ideally, if you can isolate a parasite out of its host, put in it a clear container which closely mimics the conditions found within its host, and still have it complete its life-cycle, then you can find out a lot more about how it lives.

Recently, a group of researchers from Virginia were able to successfully complete the life-cycle of Hematodinium - in vitro - which means they were able to grow it in a culture of chemical broth that sustained the parasite's every need, without any host animals involved. This was accomplished through a painstaking series of transfers, starting with isolating the parasite from infected crabs, then moving each stage into different culture mixes as it grew, all while keeping the conditions as sterile as possible. Out of the 10 isolates they attempted to grow, only 4 successfully completed their life-cycle in vitro. The researchers also found out that the parasite grows best in the dark, and indeed light exposure kills them within weeks, which makes sense given that it is pretty dark inside a crab (a variation on the Marx Brother joke).

Through this in vitro technique, they were able observe the different parasitic stages of Hematodinium directly, and view them as they would have been while floating in the blood and organs of a blue crab. They noted that when Hematodinium cells first enter the crab as "dinospores," they turn into a worm-shaped form called a "filamentous trophont" (see the accompanying photo which was from a figure in the paper). About a month after that, the cells begin transforming into clumps that are composed of multiple clones of the original infection stage. These clumps then grow into a stage called an "arachnoid trophont," which resembles a blob with numerous tendrils around its fringe (which would be embedded in the hepatopancreas of the crab). These clumps tend to merge and form larger blobs as they come into contact with each other. When those "arachnoid trophonts" fully develop, the cells in the middle of the blob start producing spores that eventually turn into the infective dinospores that escape from the crab to infect new hosts, starting the life-cycle anew.

Reference:
Li, C., Miller, T.L., Small, H.J. and Shields, J.D. (2011) In vitro culture and developmental cycle of the parasitic dinoflagellate Hematodinium sp. from the blue crab Callinectes sapidus. Parasitology 138:1924-1934.

Postscript: Three days after this post went up, I was contacted by Peter Coffey, who used to work on this species of parasite with a bit of additional information/correction: I just have one quick comment on the first sentence in your post. In blue crabs we don't see the same bitter flavor that we do in Alaskan Tanner and Snow Crabs, so we haven't been calling infections in blue crabs BCD.
Thanks Peter!

Lepeophtheirus acutus

Today, we are featuring a paper which reported on a grey reef shark (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos) at Burger's Zoo in the Netherlands that had to be euthanized. "Wait a sec!" you think, "Isn't this supposed to be a blog about parasites? I didn't come here for dead sharks!" Well, just calm down before you close your browser tab in outrage. This particular shark actually succumbed due to a heavy infection of today's parasite - Lepeophtheirus acutus. This parasite is in the same genus as other fish lice that we have previously featured on this blog, but very little is known about this particular species. Prior to this incident, it has only been reported once from the wild, and it was found on the back of a ribbon-tailed stingray (Taeniura lymma), not a shark and certainly nothing was known about how harmful it can be to its host.

From what the staff at the aquarium could work out, this deadly little crustacean was introduced to the facility by an infected male zebra shark (Stegostoma fasciatum) collected off Cairns, Australia on the Great Barrier Reef, which appeared perfectly healthy at the time and passed quarantine. However, about 2 weeks after he was introduced into the aquaria with the other fishes, he started acting weird. At the same time, the grey reef shark mentioned at the start of this post became lethargic and ceased to eat regularly, and about a month after that, both sharks were afflicted with swollen and opaque eyes. Despite the best efforts of the staff to put the infected sharks in quarantine, filter the water with activated carbon, and give them anti-parasite drugs, they were unable to save the grey reef shark, by which time it was swimming with its mouth wide open, not eating at all, and its eyes had deteriorated even further, so the decision was made to euthanize the long-suffering shark.

A necropsy revealed the identity of the killer - a parasitic copepod - most of which were found around the shark's eyes which caused them to become swollen and covered in mucus, and the mouth which led to bleeding gums. The parasite was also found on a female zebra shark and a shovelnose ray (Glaucostegus typus) which shared the aquaria with the deceased grey reef shark. Notably, the blacktip reef shark (Carcharhinus melanopterus) and blacktip sharks (Carcharhinus limbatus) which swam in the same water alongside those infected sharks did not become infected, nor did the many different species bony fishes sharing the same tanks and water. This indicates that L. acutus does display some selectivity in the type of host it infects, with a particular preference for elasmobranchs (sharks and rays), and even then only certain species within that group.

Other than the dead grey reef shark, the other infected sharks survived and recovered fully after treatment. However, this incident shows how outbreaks of infectious diseases can be a big problem for animals in the confined conditions of captivity. In the case of L. acutus, its small size, semi-transparent body, its tendency to infect parts of the host that are difficult to inspect (for example, inside the mouth), and the fact that nothing is know about its ecology meant that the staff had not anticipated such an outbreak. It was the first documented case of infection by a parasitic copepod that led to a shark dying in captivity. This case also illustrates the importance of thorough quarantine procedures, especially when introducing new animals into any facility, as captive conditions can seriously alter the transmission dynamics and pathology of relatively harmless parasites.

Image from figure in the paper.

Reference:

Kik, M.J.L., Janse, M., Benz, G.W. (2011) The sea louse Lepeophtheirus acutus (Caligidae, Siphonostomatoida, Copepoda) as a pathogen of aquarium-held elasmobranchs. Journal of Fish Diseases 34: 793-799,

Polypocephalus sp.

Today's parasite might be thought of as an "aquatic Toxoplasma" in that it also induces behavioral changes in its hosts. Polypocephalus is a genus of tapeworms that infects both shrimp (Litopenaeus setiferus) and then likely rays such as the Atlantic stingray, (Dasyatis sabina). The larvae of the cestode invade the neural tissue of the shrimp hosts, particularly in the abdominal ganglia. Studies recently showed that the more larval tapeworms a shrimp had, the more time these hosts spent walking on the substrate, as opposed to sitting still or swimming. Although the authors had predicted that they would see an increase in swimming behavior because that might expose them to predation more readily, perhaps just the increased activity in general is enough to promote transmission. Nonetheless, this was an exciting insight into a potentially new system for studying parasite manipulation of their hosts.

Source: Carreon, N., Z. Faulkes, and B. L. Fredensborg. 2011. Polypocephalus sp. infects the nervous system and increases activity of commercially harvested shrimp. Journal of Parasitology 97:755-759

Image from figure of that paper.

Nicothoë astaci

The parasite we are featuring today is Nicothoë astaci, the "lobster louse." Despite its name, it is not a "louse" (true lice are insects) as such, but rather a copepod (a type of crustacean), just like the salmon lice we have previously featured on this blog. But whereas salmon lice are well-studied due to their economic impact on salmonid fisheries (especially on farmed fishes), far less is know about the lobster louse. Despite having been recorded on the European lobster (Homarus gammarus) since the 1950s, to this day there is very little known about this parasite, including the type of pathology it causes, its complete life-cycle, or even what the male of the species looks like (parasitic copepods often have cryptic or dwarf males which are very elusive).

The paper we are looking at today is taking the first step to rectifying that situation. The photo (from the paper itself) depicts larval stages of N. astraci, with the arrows indicating the oral cone,the structure this parasite uses (along with its front pairs of legs) to attach itself to the host's gill filament and feed on its blood. While the larval stage looks like a rather ordinary copepod, as it matures into an adult, it morphs into what looks like a miniature boomerang with a pair of stretched out "wings" on either side, and a pair of bulbous egg sacs dangling from its rear end. The attachment and feeding activity of the lobster louse can cause pronounced physical damage to the lobster's gill filaments.

As with any kind of infection, you would expect to see some kind of cellular response. While the innate immune systems of invertebrates like lobsters are not as sophisticated as the adaptive immune system of vertebrate animals such as ourselves, they can present a formidable challenge to any would-be intruder (to see an example of what the cellular defence of a crustacean can do to a parasite, click here). Basically, the crustacean's equivalent of blood cells wrap themselves around the parasite or pathogen and initiate the process of melanization, where the intruder becomes entombed in a hardened capsule of melanin (the pigment which determines our skin colour). The researcher did find signs of melanization and other cellular disruption throughout the gills of infected lobsters, but none of it was near the lobster louse's attachment point.

So the lobster's immune system recognizes the presence of an intruder, but is unable to pinpoint and focus its wrath on the parasite. The authors of this paper suggest that this indicates the lobster louse is able to somehow interfere with the lobster's defensive mechanism so that it can blood-feed in peace. The mechanism through which the lobster louse disrupts this particular aspect of host physiology is yet to be uncovered, along with much of the parasite's ecology and life-cycle. Hopefully, with further research on this host-parasite system, this situation will change in the future.

Image from the paper.

Reference:

Wootton EC, Pope EC, Vogan CL, Roberts EC, Davies CE, Rowley AF. (2011) Morphology and pathology of the ectoparasitic copepod, Nicothoë astaci ('lobster louse') in the European lobster, Homarus gammarus. Parasitology 138:1285-1295.

Maritrema subdolum

This is a story about two little crustaceans and a parasitic fluke. Corophium volutator and Corophium arenarium are amphipods that make a living tunneling in the mudflats on the coast of the Danish Wadden Sea. They are also host to many species of parasitic flukes, and one of them is the parasite we are featuring today - Maritrema subdolum. Last year, we featured a related species from New Zealand - M. novaezealandensis - and much like its Kiwi cousin, M. subdolum is the bane of the local crustacean population. However, M. subdolum does not affect all of its crustacean hosts equally and this has some important ecological consequences.

Out on the Danish mudflats, C. volutator is king. Of the two Corophium species, it is the stronger competitor, reaching much higher abundances and generally making life difficult for C. arenarium. But along comes M. subdolum, which evens out the playing field. Living alongside those little crustaceans are mud snails, and during early spring they can become extremely abundant, with over 25000 snails per square metre. By summer, almost half of those snails are infected with M. subdolum, which turn them into little parasite factories, each cloning a massive reserve of parasite larval stages call cercariae that are then unleashed into the environment to infect the amphipods. The main trigger for releasing these cercariae is high temperature, and during 1990 there was a bout of unusually high temperature during summer that has been linked to North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), a phenomenon that plays a major role in determining climatic conditions in the northern hemisphere.

All of this combined into a perfect storm that devastated the C. volutator population. Triggered by high temperature, all the infected snails released their payload of parasites into the surrounding waters. Each infected snail can release hundreds of cercariae, and with thousands of snails per square metre, the shallow waters of the mudflats turned into a seething parasite soup. To the amphipod, this amounted to being in a shooting range, as each cercaria is armed with glands of digestive enzymes and a scalpel-like organ call a stylet with that they use to puncture the amphipod's exoskeleton. For many C. volutator, the outcome of being attacked by a swarm of these little horrors was terminal, and this resulted in a dramatic decline in their population. However, for some reason we still don't know, the C. arenarium population was able to weather the M. subdolum storm unscathed, either because they tolerated the parasite swarm, or because they were simply not the preferred target. Either way, with the collapse of the C. volutator population, in the next season, C. arenarium was able to succeed them and become the dominant amphipod species on the Danish mudflat.

And this dramatic ecological change was ultimately brought about by a little parasite.

Photo by Kim Mouritsen

Reference:

Larsen, M.H., Jensen, K.T. and Mouritsen, K.M. (2011) Climate influences parasite-mediated competitive release. Parasitology 138: 1436-1441

Acanthocephalus galaxii

The brown trout (Salmo trutta), a popular angling species, was introduced to the waters of New Zealand in 1867 and has become very well established in the local freshwater system. The trout have made New Zealand their own all-you-can-eat buffet, feeding on many of New Zealand's native freshwater fishes. But other native fauna have also been getting intimate with the trout in a different way. It turns out that during its time in Aotearoa, the brown trout has also picking up a new parasite - Acanthocephalus galaxii, which normally infects a little native fish call the roundhead galaxias (Galaxias anomalus).

Furthermore, the parasitic worm has actually become more abundant in the introduced trout than in the native galaxids - presumably because when compared with the tiny native fish, the much larger trout gobbles up more amphipods (the crustacean which carries the larval stage of A. galaxii). But this isn't necessarily good news for the parasite. Once they get into the trout, because of physiological incompatibility with the introduced host, the parasites are unable to reach maturity. So the trout actually acts as a kind of dead-end sink for the worm, which in turn reduces parasite burden on the native fishes.

So even while the trout might be chomping up native galaxids by the mouthful, they also are inadvertently reducing their parasite burden - though I doubt that would give much comfort to the little galaxids fleeing from a hungry trout!

References:
Paterson, R.A., Townsend, C.R., Poulin, R. and Tompkins, D.M. (2011) Introduced brown trout alter native acanthocephalan infections in native fish. Journal of Animal Ecology 88: 990-998.

Gnathia auresmaculosa

The harmfulness of parasites to their host is not always so straightforward, there are often many factors which contribute to the pathology of an infection. The parasite we are looking at today is Gnathia auresmaculosa - a type of blood-sucking crustacean with an interesting life cycle (which you can read about in this post from last year). These little gnathiids are like ticks of the sea, clinging onto passing fish and gorging themselves on blood before dropping off to continue developing. For adult fish, a few gnathiid here and there is probably not a big deal, but for growing juveniles, that is another matter.

Settlement is a critical transitional stage for coral reef fishes, and that is also when they are most vulnerable to parasites like G. auresmaculosa. A recent study by the lab group of Dr. Alexandra Grutter revealed just how costly these ticks of the sea can be to juvenile fishes. Dr. Grutter and her colleagues found that juvenile damselfish which have been fed on by just one of those little blood-suckers exhibit significantly decreased swimming ability, far higher oxygen consumption rate, and are about half as likely to survive than uninfected fishes.

So if you happen to find yourself on a beautiful tropical reef, take a moment to think about all the little baby fishes which are swimming for their lives through the gauntlet of gnathiids - they never mentioned that in Finding Nemo!

Reference:
Grutter, A.S., Crean, A.J., Curtis, L.M., Kuris, A.M., Warner, R.R. and McCormick, M.I. (2011) Indirect effects of an ectoparasite reduce successful establishment of a damselfish at settlement. Functional Ecology 25: 586-594

Chondracanthus parvus

Chondracanthus parvus is a parasitic copepod that parasitises the smooth-cheek sculpin, Eurymen hyrinus, by attaching itself to the inner side of the fish's operculum (the flap covering the fish's gills). Chondracanthus parvus belongs to a family of parasitic copepods known as the chondracanthids, which contains 160 species, all of which are parasites of marine fishes. Phylogenetic studies of the chondracanthids indicate that these copepod have consistently co-evolved with their hosts, and their phylogeny closely reflects the evolutionary history of the fish that they infect. Such parasites are like heirlooms of the evolutionary past and phylogenetic studies conducted on these living markers can in turn shed light on the evolutionary history of their hosts.

Picture from Ho et al. (2006).

References:

Paterson, A.M. and Poulin, R. (1999) Have chondracanthid copepods co-speciated with their teleost hosts? Systematic Parasitology 44:79-85.

Ho, J-s., Kim, I-H., and Nagasawa, K. (2006) Copepod parasites of the fatheads (Pisces, Psychrolutidae) and their implication on the phylogenetic relationships of Psychrolutid genera. Zoological Science 22:411-425.

Herpyllobius vanhoeffeni

Regular readers of this blog will no doubt be familiar with the wonderfully weird and twisted morphology of parasitic copepods. However, this is probably the weirdest we have featured yet. Herpyllobius vanhoeffeni is a spooky-looking parasitic copepod which has all the trappings you might associate with an Lovercraftian horror tale. They are found in the Antarctic Penninsula, in waters 666-673m deep, and they parasitise a polychaete worm, Eulagisca corrientis.

The top picture shows a pair of females attached to the ventral surface of their host; note that the lower individual has a pair of lobe-shaped egg sacs extending from its side like wings. The bottom picture shows a specimen that has been dissected from the host, showing the rest of the copepod, which is usually embedded in the host. Overall, the whole parasite looks not unlike a bulbous skull resting atop a twisted stalk of a body.

Reference:
López-González, P.J. and Bresciani, J. (2001) New Antarctic records of Herpyllobius Steenstrup and Lütken, 1861 (parasitic Copepoda) from the EASIZ-III cruise, with description of two new species. Scientia Marina 65:357-366

Colobomatus sillaginis

Colobomatus sillaginis is a parasitic copepod that lives in the head of two species of fish (commonly known in Australia as "whiting") in the genus Sillago (Sillago maculata and Sillago analis). This copepod dwells in the system of cephalic canals in the head of the fish. Interestingly, while the gut tracts of males and juvenile females are bright green, the gut of mature female copepods are usually coloured red or black. Living in the cephalic canal alongside C. sillaginis are small ciliates that are bright green due to the symbiotic algae living within them. These ciliates can be so numerous that some fish have a greenish tinge around front of the head. The male and juvenile female copepods graze upon this turf of abundant food. However, once they become mature, the female takes to feeding on blood, probably due to the physiological demand of egg production, rather like a female mosquito which normally feeds on nectar, but needs to obtain a blood meal for egg development.

Reference:
West, G.A. (1983) A new philichthyid copepod parasitic in whiting (Sillago spp.) from Australian waters. Journal of Crustacean Biology 3: 622-628.

Contributed by Tommy Leung.

Arthurhumesia canadiensis

Parasites come in all kinds of bizarre shapes and you don't get much more bizarre than today's parasite - Arthurhumesia canadiensis. This species is a parasitic copepod that lives inside the intestine of the compound ascidian (sea squirt) Aplidium solidum. The diagram shows a female specimen, with a pair of lobe-like egg sacs attached. And if you are wondering "what's the weird little blob the arrow is pointing at?", well that's the male copepod. This weird little crustacean is named after Arthur Humes - a very prolific taxonomist. Over the course of 60 years, he was responsible for describing over 700 new species of parasitic copepods. So it's only right that a copepod named after him would appear on a blog which is about parasite biodiversity!

Reference:
Bresciani, J. and López-González, P.J. 2001. Arthurhumesia canadiensis, new genus and species of a highly transformed parasitic copepod (Crustacea) associated with an ascidian from British Columbia. Journal of Crustacean Biology 21(1): 90-95.

Contributed by Tommy Leung.

October 19 - Pseudomyicola spinosus

Pseudomyicola spinosus is a parasitic copepod that is found in more than 50 species of bivalves around the world, ranging from clams to mussels to scallops. It dwells in the mantle cavity of the bivalve, where it grazes on mucus produced by the host. This copepod has a pair of hook-like attachment appendages that allow it to cling to the host tissue and avoid being swept away by the constant water flow that passes through the mantle cavity. In large numbers, they can cause considerable tissue damage to the host - the constant attachment and reattachment of the copepod (which can be highly mobile within the host's body cavity) aggravate host tissue, causing epithelial erosion and induce over-production of mucus. At lower infection levels, the tissue damage caused by the copepod is almost negligible, but it does have a more subtle effect on its host. It has been found that infection with just a few P. spinosus is associated with higher levels of infections by metcercarial cysts of echinostomatid trematodes such as Curtuteria australis and Acanthoparyphium. Once again, this is possibly due to the effects of the copepod's attachment appendages, which damage the epidermis in such a way that facilitates subsequent invasion by trematode cercariae.

References:

Cáceres-Martínez, J. and Vásquez-Yeomans, R. (1997). Presence and histopathological effects of the copepod Pseudomyicola spinosus in Mytilus galloprovincialis and Mytilus californianus. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 70, 150–155.

Leung, T. L. F. and Poulin, R. (2007). Interactions between parasites of the cockle Austrovenus stutchburyi: Hitch-hikers, resident-cleaners, and habitat-facilitators. Parasitology 134, 247–255.

Post and image by Tommy Leung.

October 15 - Nerocila acuminata

Nerocila acuminata is a parasitic isopod related to Cymothoa exigua, the infamous "tongue-replacer". While N. acuminata doesn't have the morbid habit of replacing the tongue of its host with itself, that certainly doesn't make it more endearing. This isopod clings onto the skin of its fish host, feeding on blood and tissue. When it detects a potential host, this parasites becomes a fish-seeking missile - it launches itself at the target fish like a guided torpedo, making precise directional and speed adjustments to ensure it lands on its target with claws outstretched . Upon contact, the isopod starts digging in, causing terrible, terrible damage to the skin of its fish. In addition to damaged tissue and blood loss, such aggravated injuries can often lead to secondary infection by bacterial infection. Compared with the "tongue-biter", this parasite is one nasty customer.


Contributed by Tommy Leung and photo by Peter Bryant.

October 10 - Microdajus langi

The parasite for today comes from a strange family of ectoparasitic crustaceans called Tantulocarida. There are only a few species within this family and they have a very peculiar development. They are parasitic on a number of deep sea crustaceans, and Microdajus langi itself infects small, shrimp-like crustaceans call tanaids.

Tantulocarids have a very strange life-cycle which is either asexual (which is more common) or sexual (relatively rare). In the asexual cycle, only females larvae are produced. Non-feeding larval stages known as tantulus are released from asexual females which resemble sacs and these larvae can directly attach and infect another host. On the left side of the accompanying photo is an immature female that had just attached onto the host, but once it is attached, it undergoes a strange transformation. On the right side of the photo, you can see a female that has just begun undergoing this development and she eventually develops into a bloated sac filled with eggs.

However, in the sexual cycle both males and females are produced and while males have never been observed alive, they have well-developed swimming legs and sensory organs which allow them to actively seek out and inseminate females. Once fertilised, the female attaches herself onto a crustacean host to start the cycle anew.

Photos from: Boxshall, G.A. and Lincoln, R.J. (1987) The Life Cycle of the Tantulocarida (Crustacea). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B 315: 267-303.

Contributed by Tommy Leung.

September 3 - Liriopsis pygmaea

Parasites don't always have things go their own ways. Even in the parasite world, sometimes the hustler gets hustled. There are parasites which specifically infects other parasites, called "hyperparasites" and Liriopsis pygmaea is one such example. The false king crab Paralomis granulosa is host to a rhizocephalan parasite called Briariosaccus callosus which belongs in the same group of parasitic barnacles as Sacculina carcini (which we met back in January 7).

Liriopsis pygmaea attaches itself to the externa of B. callosus and parasitises it (see pale blobs in photo, arrow indicating externa of B. callosus). L. pygmaea belongs to the group of isopods call the cryptoniscid. While most people are familiar with isopods in the form of slaters and pillbugs you see in the garden, adult L. pygmaea bears a closer resemblance to the cherry tomatoes which might be growing in the said garden than their isopod cousins. Just as B. callosus castrate its crab host, L. pygmaea does the same to the rhizocephalan - drawing resources away from the parasitic barnacle and using it for its own reproduction. So in this case, the castrator, becomes the castrated.


The photo and the info for write up came from this paper:

Lovrich, G. A., Roccatagliata, D., Peresan, L. (2004) Hyperparasitism of the cryptoniscid isopod Liriopsis pygmaea on the lithodid Paralomis granulosa from the Beagle Channel, Argentina. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 58:71-77.

Contributed by Tommy Leung.

August 18 - Profilicollis altmani

Parasites that have complex life cycles involving marine creatures really baffle me - the odds of them completing their life cycle just seems so unlikely - and yet they do. Profilicollis altmani is a species of acanthocephalan (thorny-headed worm) that uses mole crabs (Emerita spp.) as its intermediate hosts and then infects shore birds like Herring Gulls as the definitive host. The adult parasite attaches to the intestines of the bird and then will release eggs into its feces where they somehow make their way to new foraging crabs. This parasite is also of recent interest because it appears to have jumped hosts into sea otters, where it can cause fatality. The otters are not normally hosts of these parasites, but perhaps are becoming infected as a result of eating prey that they normally do not.

Photo by Tricia Goulding, Romberg Tiburon Center for Environmental Studies, San Francisco State University.

August 2 - Gnathia trimaculata

TThe parasite for today is a parasitic isopod belonging to the family Gnathiidae - the larvae of this particular species feed upon the requiem shark (Carcharinus melanopterus). There are many different species of gnathiids parasitising many different species of fish, and they have an interesting life-cycle which involve "protelian parasitism" where only the juvenile stages (called a praniza) are parasitic, while the adult stages are free-living. They go through several stages of development, alternating between feeding and non-feeding developing stages (when they are engorged with blood) before reaching sexual maturity.

They are almost like a functional equivalent of ticks for fishes - they wait in ambush for a passing host, and when one arrives, it climbs onboard, sucks blood for a few days until full, then drops off to develop into the next stage. And like ticks, they can also act as vectors which can transmit blood parasites between the fishes they feed upon.

The photo shows a pair of third-stage pranizae, scale bar is 1 mm and it came from this paper:

Coetzee, M.L., Smit, N.J., Grutter, A.S., Davies, A.J. (2009) Gnathia trimaculata n. sp. (Crustacea: Isopoda: Gnathiidae), an ectoparasite found parasitising requiem sharks from off Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Systematic Parasitology 79:97-112


Contributed by Tommy Leung.

July 22 - Ommatokoita elongata

If you find the idea of having something lodged in your eye distressing (ok let's face it, who doesn't?), then today's parasite is probably your worst nightmare. Fortunately for you, it is not a human parasite. The hosts for today's parasite are Greenland sharks (Somniosus microcephalus) and Pacific sleeper sharks (Somniosus pacificus) - both large deep water sharks. Ommatokoita elongata is a parasitic copepod, approximately 5 cm in length (almost 2 inches) with a very specific and truly cringe-worthy preference about where it attaches on to the host.The adult female copepod attaches herself to the shark's eye with an anchoring structure call the bulba, and grazes on the surface of the cornea (see photo, black arrow indicates attachment point), hanging off the eyes of the shark like a grotesque tassle

There are two possible reasons for the copepod's attachment site. Shark skin is covered in microscopic, teeth-like structures call denticles which can make it difficult for parasites to attach themselves to skin (though some species of parasitic copepods
manage). Secondly the eye is considered to be a "immunologically benign environment" for parasites, thus such an attachment is less likely to illicit an immune response.

While the parasite can cause significant damage to the cornea and result in blindness for the host, most sharks seem unaffected by the presence of the parasite and many sharks have the copepod in both eyes, strangely enough. This goes to show when considering the virulence (harmfulness of a parasite to its host) of a parasite, it is worth taking into account the perspective of the host involved - what may seem debilitating to us may not necessarily be the case for the actual organism in question.


Photo source: Borucinska, J.D., Benz, G.W. and Whiteley, H.E. (1998) Ocular lesions associated with attachment of the parasitic copepod Ommatokoita elongata (Grant) to corneas of Greenland sharks, Somniosus microcephalus (Bloch & Schneider) Journal of Fish Diseases, 21:415-422

Also some good photos of live Greenland sharks with the parasite can be seen in Caloyianis, N. "Greenland Sharks." National Geographic 194, no. 3 (1998): 60–71.

Contributed by Tommy Leung.

June 24 - Zaops ostreum

How many kind of food can you name comes with its own side dish? Well, the eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) should be on that list. This week. we've already seen how a trematode infection can improve the taste of oysters, but it seems that oyster also comes with another gastronomic treat in the form of the pea crab Zaops ostreum. Pea crabs (family Pinnotheridae) are small soft bodied crabs which live inside a variety of marine invertebrates, with most species living in bivalves. Zaops ostreum infect the oyster as a tiny first stage larvae, and grow to maturity within the bivalve's mantle cavity, feeding upon food-laden mucus strings produced by its host's filtering action. It is a true parasite in that it causes harm to its host. Not only does it steal food from the oyster, it also forms an obstruction within the body cavity and erode the gill tissue. From a culinary perspective, there are many serving suggestions available for pea crabs - they can be served raw, deep fried, or sautéed, and can be eaten either as a side dish to oysters, or even on their own (if you can get enough of them to make a meal!).

Photo and contribution by Tommy Leung.

June 12 - Paramoeba perniciosa

This amoeba is responsible for causing disease in several species of crabs and lobster. It is a feared parasite amongst crab fishermen and Maryland foodies as epizootics can cause very high mortality of crabs such as blue crabs and gray crabs, by destroying their connective tissue.

Image from micro*scope.