Phronima sp.

Today's guest post is by Katie O'Dwyer, a PhD student currently at University of Otago in the Evolutionary and Ecological Parasitology research group. In one of my conference reports last year, I mentioned some of the research that she is currently conducting on parasitic flukes that live in periwinkles. She has provided us with a post about a parasite that she came across while walking along a beach in New Zealand.

Phronima and its salp barrel.
Photo by Katie O'Dwyer, used here with permission

After recently finding some salps containing the amphipod Phronima, washed up on a beach in New Zealand, I decided this was a worthy group to compose a blog about. It helped too that I was already interested in this group of crustaceans, having assisted with some work on them in Ireland. Read on for some interesting information on this little studied group of parasitic organisms…

Imagine a parasite which can create its own mobile nursery for its young, a parasite which is thought to be the inspiration behind the chestbusting xenomorph in the popular movie Alien. Well imagine no more! Introducing Phronima, the pram bug. These amphipods are members of the Phronimidae, a group of ten species of hyperiid amphipod, which occur in the water column throughout the open ocean. This sets them apart from their close relatives, which typically inhabit the benthic environment of the seafloor. So what has allowed this particular family to adapt to the pelagic or open water environment?

Those adorable little babies!
Photo by Katie O'Dwyer, used here with permission

Enter salps. What is a salp? Salps are gelatinous zooplankton which drift throughout our oceans. They may occur singly or in huge chains composed of individual salps linked together. Phronima is equipped with impressive front claws and with these they attach to an individual salp and carve away its insides until it forms a barrel. Phronima then climbs inside and sails the sea from inside a gelatinous barrel, collecting food from the water column. A number of questions may now come to mind regarding this symbiosis; has Phronima killed its host, which suggests that it is a parasitoid rather than a parasite, and why does it carry this barrel around as it must be pretty energetically expensive, right?

Well, as mentioned, these organisms live in the open ocean which presents several challenges to collecting samples for answering these questions. However, some dedicated researchers have indeed managed to study these fascinating creatures on the rare occasion that such an opportunity arises. From their research they have found that the salp in fact still contains live cells, although it hardly resembles a salp anymore with just a barrel of tissue remaining. The presence of live cells means that the barrel maintains its structure and that is important for Phronima to have a sturdy home. As the barrel barely resembles a live salp any longer, Phronima should really be considered as parasitoids rather than parasites.

Do a barrel roll!
Photo by Katie O'Dwyer, used here with permission

As for the energy involved in carrying around this barrel, the barrel provides a larger structure than the amphipod itself and this enables the Phronima to be more buoyant in the water column. However, some energy is still required to carry around this jelly barrel. Overall energy usage by Phronima is higher than that of benthic amphipods but on the lower spectrum compared with other pelagic or open water amphipods. This suggests that Phronima have indeed adapted to a unique niche which enables them to travel in the water column with their young and access new food resources without this behaviour being too energetically costly.

One unusual finding in the research thus far is that male Phronima are also found in barrels. If Phronima is known as the pram bug, which suggests the barrel is important for carrying offspring, then why should males carry a barrel too? Could they use it as part of some mating strategy, where they pass the barrel on to the female they mate with? Due to the difficulties associated with studying organisms that dwell in the open ocean many questions remain unanswered and this leaves us ever more curious and fascinated by creatures such as Phronima.

References:

Hirose, E., Aoki, M. N., & Nishikawa, J. (2005). Still alive? Fine structure of the barrels made by Phronima (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 85: 1435-1439.

Bishop, R. E., & Geiger, S. P. (2006). Phronima energetics: is there a bonus to the barrel? Crustaceana 79: 1059-1070.

This post was written by Katie O'Dwyer.

Choniomyzon inflatus

Photo of C. inflatus from the paper

I guess you could say that the parasite we are featuring today is a "balloon animal" and indeed its name refers to that property. According to the paper that described and named this copepod - Choniomyzon inflatus - "The specific name of the new species is a reference to its swollen prosome, which resembles a balloon."

But you won't be finding this odd little crustacean at any kid's party, instead it is usually attached to the egg masses of smooth fan lobsters (Ibacus novemdentatus) on the coast of western Japan. It is the third species from the genus Choniomyzon to have ever been described. The other two known species are C. panuliri, which are found on spiny lobsters from India, the British Solomon Islands and the Great Barrier Reef, and C. libiniae, which live on spider crabs from São Sebastião Island, Brazil. All three species attach themselves to the external eggs masses of their respective hosts.

SEM photo of C.inflatus
from the paper

So why do they look like a miniature hopper ball toy? Well, that relates to where they live and what they feed on. Chioniomyzon inflatus belongs to a family of copepods called the Nicothoidae and the reason they do this Humpty Dumpty impersonation is so that they can insinuate themselves amidst the eggs masses of larger crustaceans.

Normally the host crustaceans would remove any foreign particles or organisms that get caught up in their brood pouch or egg mass, but by disguising themselves as an egg, C. inflatus and their relatives can stay there undisturbed. And while the appearance seems comical to us, it is seriously bad news for its host because nicothoid copepods are egg-eaters - they have a syringe-like mouthpart with which they puncture their host's eggs and suck out their contents.

So C. inflatus masquerades as just another egg in the brood to avoid being expelled meanwhile munching on the actual eggs around it. This strategy is rather reminiscent of another creature that we featured during the first year of the Parasite of the Day blog - the cuckoo catfish which hides its eggs amongst that of mouth-brooding cichlids. You can read more about the cuckoo catfish here.

Reference:
Wakabayashi, K., Otake, S., Tanaka, Y., & Nagasawa, K. (2013). Choniomyzon inflatus n. sp.(Crustacea: Copepoda: Nicothoidae) associated with Ibacus novemdentatus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Scyllaridae) from Japanese waters. Systematic parasitology 84: 157-165.

Another year of parasites in insects, in shellfish and in extreme environments

It is hard to believe that it's already been another year again, and it was a particularly exciting year too, with a lot happening with and around this blog. In terms of the parasites we featured on here, there were some which can be considered to be pretty extreme; like the only external parasite found on guppies that live in noxious tar pits, and some tapeworms with an special affinity for heavy metal. There are those that might make your squirm; like the sexually-transmitted roundworm in anole lizards, and a crustacean that lives in a fish's bladder.

We gave seafood fans some food for thought with some parasites that plague catfish and flounder, and checked in on bunch of clam parasites (tapeworms and flukes) and mussel parasites too (Himasthla elongata). And while fish and shellfish might provide some fodder for parasites, on land, insects provide plenty more opportunities for parasitism, after all, insects are the most diverse group of animals on Earth and they make abundant hosts; from crickets to hornets to ants, and amongst these parasite of insects (some of which are insects themselves) there are some rather sinister ones - like the parasitoid wasp that takes its host to the edge of death so it can be a more compliant host, or the mosquito-killing round worms which sit like mines to be activated upon detecting the presence of its mosquito larva host.

Of course, this year we also had some guest bloggers in the form of students from the University of New England ZOOL329/529 class of 2013 who wrote about how toxic birds makes for sad lice, self-medicating in bees, avian malaria parasites that make their host more attractive to mosquitoes, and how an intertidal fluke might respond to a rise in global temperature. Also, as with last year, we brought you some conference coverage too (part 1, part 2).

We will be back next year with plenty more posts about the newest research in fields relating to parasitology which you might not have heard or read about elsewhere, and as usual, I have already lined up a few which I am going to be writing about... See you all next year!

P.S. If you can't wait until next year, you can find some of my other parasite-related writing on The Conversation about freeze-tolerant parasites, a worm that usurp hornet queens, and fungi that plague the zombie ant fungus. And alongside writing this blog, I've doing a regular radio segment call "Creepy but Curious" where I sometimes talk about parasitic (among other things), like the zombie ants, the infamous crab-castrating Sacculina, the tongue-biter parasite, and the virus that melts caterpillars.

Lethacotyle vera

Images from the paper 

While "many sucker-cups at the rear" sounds like the description for a Lovecraftian monstrosity, that is the name of a group of monogenean parasites called the Polyopisthocotylea. Let's just refer to them as "Poly-Opees" from this point to avoid that tongue-twister. They are ectoparasitic flatworms usually found on the gills of marine fish. Seeing as fish use their gills to extract oxygen from their aquatic environment, there is a constant flow of water washing over these parasites, which means these flatworms are essentially living in a high-flow environment. To secure themselves to the gill filaments, they have a sucker structure on their rear - this sucker anchors the worm in place, allowing it to flex the rest of its body and browse on gill tissue and blood.

The rear suckers of monogeneans are not just a simple suction cup, but are composed of an array of intricate anchors, hooks, and clamps that vary considerably between different groups. In the case of the Poly-Opees, this sucker is armed with a series of clamps that gives that entire group its name. But today we are featuring a species that completely bucks that trend. Like most other Poly-Opees, it is also found on the gills of fish, but stands out due to the complete lack of clamps on its rear sucker.

Lethacotyle vera is closely related to a monogenean that was originally described over sixty years ago. The first species described from the genus Lethacotyle was Lethacotyle fijiensis - which was described from a unspecified carangid fish from Fiji (note to fellow scientists - please take detailed notes!), but there are only four specimens of this parasite in existence and only one of them is stored in a museum available for researchers to examine.

A group of researchers revisiting this species' description noted the unusual absence of clamps on its rear sucker and decided to follow up the lead to look for this mysterious monogenean (or at least a related species - which was what they found). As L. fijiensis was originally described from a carangid fish (the group which include jacks, pompanos, trevally and scad), they decided that's where they should start looking. They obtained some Brassy trevally (Caranax papuensis) from some amateur fishermen and fish markets at New Caledonia and looked through the fish's gills for monogenean parasites.

In was on the gills of those trevally that they came across the new species we are featuring today. They were able to confirm that monogeneans in the Lethacotyle genus do indeed lack clamps compeltely on their rear end. Poly-Opees vary in the number of clamps they have - some species have dozens of well-developed clamps while others have clamps that are rather small and may even be considered as vestigial. In the case of Lethocotyle, they are completely gone.

But if they have no clamps, how do they hang on? They have four tiny hooks on their rear, but they are so small that they probably contribute little to securing the worm in place. The researchers noted that instead, the rear sucker has turned into a flap covered in "tegumental striations" in the place of clamps. These are microscopic wrinkles that increase friction and provide traction against a substrate - these microscopic structures might be somewhat comparable to those found on the foot pads of some insects. In this case, it provides enough traction to keep L. vera securely fastened to the gills of its host.

What the story of the Lethocotyle genus and their rear suckers shows us is that parasites are far from being "simplified" evolutionary dead ends, but that they continue to evolve new structures even as they shed others. As with free-living species, certain features often become lost or vestigial over the course of evolution, but then new structures evolve in their place. Lethacotyle might have lost its clamps, but it has also gained a new attachment feature (striation-covered flap) that makes it unique among all the known monogeneans.

Reference:
Justine, J. L., Rahmouni, C., Gey, D., Schoelinck, C., & Hoberg, E. P. (2013). The Monogenean Which Lost Its Clamps. PloS one, 8(11): e79155.

Tracheliastes polycolpus

Photo of adult T. polycolpus from here

Tracheliastes polycolpus is a parasitic copepod that lives on freshwater fish and does so by attaching to the fins of its host, grazing on mucus and epithelial cells. While T. polycolpus can infect a handful of different freshwater fishes, it is primarily found on the beaked dace (Leuciscus burdigalensis). When they occur in large numbers, their feeding activities can severely erode the fins of their hosts, so much that in some fish the fins are gnawed down to mere nubs (see the photo below of a heavily parasitised dace, with outlines showing the missing fin tissue).

So when it gets crowded on this parasite's usual, preferred host, some T. polycolpus find a home elsewhere and start parasitising other species of fish living in the same area. Even though T. polycolpus is considered to be a host generalist and can infect multiple species of fish, not all fish are considered equally habitable for this parasite and it does have a predilection for certain species over others. So what determines which other fish end up acquiring these parasitic copepods?

A group of scientists from France conducted a study looking at T. polycolpus population on freshwater fish in two French rivers, focusing on the 10 most abundant fish species in those rivers. Of the fish that they examined, eight of them were cyprinids (the family of fish that include dace, roach, and carp) while the two remaining species were the stone loach and brown trout.

Photo of parasitised dace with missing fin tissue from this paper

Only cyrpinids were found to be infected with T. polycolpus and of those only four species (dace, nase, gudgeon, minnows) were found to be consistently infected across both study sites. It turns out that next to the beaked dace, the second most preferred host for T. polycolpus is Parachondrostoma toxostoma, also known as South-west European Nase. After the beaked dace, it was the most commonly infected fish, especially in the Viaur river where there was generally higher abundance of the parasite.

It just so happens that out of all the fishes in those rivers, the nase is most similar to the dace in terms of its general body size, feeding style and habitat, making it the ideal second choice for T. polycolpus. On the flip side, it seems that minnow is the worst host for T. polycolpus - it hosted the least parasites out of the four fish species that were found with T. polycolpus and the parasites that were found on minnows were smaller and produced less eggs than those found on the other fish species. This is probably due to the minnow being a smaller fish than the beaked dace or the nase, so it does not produce as much mucus for T. polycolpus to graze on.

So even when generalist parasites do infect other hosts, they prefer some familiarity. The more similar you are (physiologically and/or ecologically) to the parasite's preferred host, the more likely that you will be next in line to get infected should the parasite's preferred host become too heavily parasitised.

But here's an added to layer to this story which you might want to consider - the South-west European nase is actually listed as a vulnerable species - its population has declined by at least 30% in the past 10 years due to habitat destruction and hybridisation with introduced species, so if the number of nase continues to decline, what does this mean for T. polycolpus? Would this result in increased parasite pressure on other fish species as they find themselves soaking up the "excess" T. polycolpus? Or will the the beaked dace experience even more exacerbated pathology as T. polycolpus are left with less alternative hosts to infect?

Reference:
Lootvoet, A., Blanchet, S., Gevrey, M., Buisson, L., Tudesque, L., & Loot, G. (2013). Patterns and processes of alternative host use in a generalist parasite: insights from a natural host–parasite interaction. Functional Ecology 27: 1403-1414

Ophiocordyceps sessilis

There are many species of fungi that infect insects and some of the most well-known species are the ones that infect ants, better known to most as the "zombie ant fungus". We have previously featured one such fungus and its ant-jacking antics on this blog. But while most people might think that there's just a single zombie ant fungus out there which is responsible for creating this intriguing wonder (or nightmare) of nature, there are actually many different species of such fungi and they are found all over the world infecting various different insects. In the Ophiocordyceps genus alone there are over a hundred species and there might be some undescribed fungi that are hiding in plain sight because they have been misidentified and misclassified as a previously known species.

Photo of Ophiocordyceps sessilis from
Fig. 1 of the paper

Today, we are going to be featuring one such fungus and it hails from Japan where they are called Kobugata-aritake which means the "bump-neck ant fungus". The fungi specimen described in the paper we are discussing today were originally collected in 2006 from a forest near the village of Iitate, Fukushima. They were initially thought to be specimen of a fairly commonly found species call Ophiocordyceps pulvinata, but upon reexamination, researchers noticed a number of key differences which separated O. sessilis from O. pulvinata.

Both fungi were found sprouting from dead ants which had their mandibles clamped tightly around a branch in the typical "zombie ant" pose, but whereas O. pulvinata produce a bulbous fruiting body that sprouts from the back of the ant's head (see photo on lower left), ants infected with O sessilis are covered in spiny fruiting bodies jutting out all over the ant's body (see photo on upper right).

Further difference between the two fungi can be seen under the microscope; O. pulvinata produce discrete spores that are long and slim, but the spores of O. sessilis look like beads on a necklace which readily breaks apart into small "part-spores". These part-spores of O. sessilis can also germinate on malt-extract agar plates within two days, growing into soft, velvety colonies of fungal mass, whereas O. pulvinata spores failed to grow on such artificial medium. Finally, comparisons of sequences from selected genetic markers revealed that O. sessilis is clearly a very different species to O. pulvinata.

Photo of Ophiocordyceps pulvinata from
Fig. 1 of the paper

A peculiar thing the researchers noticed is that O. sessilis is only ever found in ants that are also infected with O. pulvinata. They suggested that O. sessilis is actually a parasite of O. pulvinata itself and noted other Ophiocordyceps species are often found in pairs, so what had previously be considered as coinfections may in fact be a case of hyperparasitism (whereby a parasite is itself infected by a parasite).

However, there is another possibility that the researchers did not mention in their paper, which was that O. sessilis needs O. pulvinata to pave the way in order for them to colonise the ant's body. An example of this is can be found among fluke-snail host-parasite systems. Like most digenean trematodes, the blood fluke Austrobilharzia terrigalensis they needs to infect a snail for the asexual part of its life cycle, but unlike those other species, A. terrigalensis cannot infect a snail on its own and is always found in snails that are already infected with another species of fluke. The coinfecting species always appear shriveled and emaciated in the presence of A. terrigalensis and it has been suggested that while A. terrigalensis lacks the ability to subvert or suppress the immune defences of snails, they are capable of colonising a snail once its defences have been knocked out by another species, at which point they barge in, overpower the resident parasite and take over the host.

So either O. sessillis is a hyperparasite (or a "mycoparasite" - a parasite of a fungus) of O. pulvinata, or it cannot colonise a host on its own and instead piggybacks on O. pulvinata, eventually usurping it and taking over the ant for its own. Either way, it appears that O. sessilis is a fungus that can hijack a fungus which is used to hijacking ants.

Reference:
Kaitsu, Y., Shimizu, K., Tanaka, E., Shimano, S., Uchiyama, S., Tanaka, C., & Kinjo, N. (2013). Ophiocordyceps sessilis sp. nov., a new species of Ophiocordyceps on Camponotus ants in Japan. Mycological Progress 12: 755-761.

P.S. I recently wrote an article for The Conversation about parasites that can survive freezing - including the hairworm (otherwise known as the parasite that gives crickets nightmares). To read it, just follow this link here.

Sphaerularia vespae

Hornets can put fear into the minds of many people, but today meet the parasite that the hornets fear (if they are capable of fear). Sphaerularia vespae is a parasitic nematode that infects the Japanese yellow hornet (Vespa simillima) and as far as infection goes, this one is quite a doozy. It specifically invade and resides in the gaster (abdomen) of female hornets where it grows and develop. The nematode ends up sterilising the host (much like other parasitic castrators we have featured on this blog), turning her into a cozy nursery for baby worms. But a new study has shown that they are capable of doing more than just castrate the hornet.

Photo of a queen hornet (from Fig. 2 of the paper)

In a previous study, a group of scientists noticed that the majority of overwintered hornet queens caught in bait traps were infected with S. vespae, so there is something about these nematode-infected hornets which seems to make them more likely to end up in those traps. During autumn/fall, queen hornets fortunate enough not to be infected with S. vespae would visit and poke around various nooks and crannies (usually decayed logs) in the forest to find a spot to hibernate. When the hornet find a place she likes, she will start excavating a hibernacula ( a place to hibernate) and line it with plant fibres that serve as nesting material. But queens that are parasitised and sterilised by S. vespae start visiting decaying logs much earlier during early to mid-summer.

A team of scientists in Japan decided to find out just what those infected queens are up to. For three months between May and August, they made regular weekly visits to a predesignated sites in a forest at the foot of Mount Moiwa and set up a video cameras to observe the decayed logs in the morning and afternoon.

Photo of a hornet releasing
some S. vespae juveniles
(from Fig. 2 of the paper)

They saw that unlike other hornets, the nematode-infected queens never dig nor gather nesting material. They simply crawl inside a decayed log, hang out for a while, then fly off. That is because they have become sterilised couriers that visited potential hibernation sites only to drop off a special package in the form of S. vespae juveniles. A quarter of the infect queens they saw landing on decayed logs offloaded some nematodes (there were some hornets that moved out of sight so the scientist couldn't see what they were up to). But in addition to those observations, the scientists also captured some hornet queens and brought them back to the laboratory for further examination. They kept them in vials and noticed that over two-third of the infected hornets ended up releasing juvenile worms.

When they dissected hornets to see how many of them were infected and to check the developmental stage of their parasites, they found a seasonal pattern to the infections. Queens caught during May and June were mostly infected with fully-mature female worms and their eggs, while queens caught between July and throughout August were filled with juvenile worms that were ready to disembark and infect a new host - which just so happen to be the period when parasitised queens start making regular visits to potential hibernation sites.

So that is S. vespae's game - use the hornet as a mobile incubator/nursery, fly her around during summer to scope out the best pieces of real estate around the forest, then drop off a bundle of worms that can lie in wait like a booby-trap for an uninfected hornet queen to come along and settle in for winter. To complete its life cycle, S. vespae simply take advantage of a preexisting behaviour (seeking out hibernation sites) from the host's repertoire, and "switch it on" at a different time of year to fit the developmental schedule of the parasite's own offspring. Parasite manipulation isn't necessarily about teaching an old host new tricks, but to get the host to perform the tricks that it already knows in a brand new context.

Reference:
Sayama, K., Kosaka, H., & Makino, S. (2013) Release of juvenile nematodes at hibernation sites by overwintered queens of the hornet Vespa simillima. Insectes Sociaux 60: 383-388.

Paragordius varius

Photo of adult worm by Matthew Bolek

The nematomorphs, or horsehair worms, are well-known for their ability to persuade their insect host to jump into a pool of water, thus allowing the adult worm to escape and reproduce. After mating, the adult worm lays eggs which comes out in these long, white, spaghetti-like strings (see photo on the right). The eggs hatch into free-swimming larvae that then infect aquatic invertebrates such as freshwater snails, mosquito larvae, or other small aquatic critters. Once it infects this host, the larva takes between 5-14 days to develop into a cyst stage which is ready to infect a cricket where it can mature into an adult.

The trouble with studying a parasite like the horsehair worm is that because they have multiple hosts in their life cycle, in order to keep them in a laboratory you would have to also maintain colonies of all its host animals on stand-by to act as sacrificial hosts for the hairworm larvae to infect. Additionally, those little invertebrates are not always "in season" and they may not be available in sufficient number when the infective stages of the parasite are available for experimentation.

If scientists can somehow put the life cycle of these parasites on hold at each stage until suitable hosts become available for the parasites to infect, not only would it become less logistically challenging to maintain them in the laboratory, it would also allow scientists to carry out more detailed studies on their life cycles. Fortunately, there is an aspect of their biology that may allow scientists to do just that - the parasite we are featuring today - Paragordius varius - along with other hairworms that live in temperate regions are capable of surviving through winter either as a dormant larva or a cyst inside an aquatic invertebrate that waits until spring comes when there are cricket hosts around. During the winter months the larval or cyst stage of the parasite simply stay in a state of suspended animation as their surroundings freezes over.

This is also good news for scientists who wish to study them - these worms' ability to survive freezing means that the larval stages can be "put on hold" until suitable hosts become available. To explore the tolerance limit of these parasites, a team of scientists put some P. varius larvae and snails infected with P. varius cysts under a series of different conditions including freezing at -30°C or -70°C for 15-30 days or dried out at room temperature or -70°C for the same period of time.

Photo of P. varius larva from Nematomorpha.net

They found that larvae that has been frozen in water at both -30°C or -70°C still managed to infect snails once they have been thawed and they did it just as well as those that were not previously frozen. The only group that did not fare as well were the larvae that have been dried out at room temperature for a month. The cyst stage of the parasite were not as hardy as the larvae and experience a slight decrease in the number of cysts in snails that have been frozen compared to those that were not, and being dried out dramatically decrease the survival of P. varius cysts. Nevertheless those that did survive the freezing process were still able to infect crickets once they were thawed. And while P. varius seems to cope better with getting frozen rather than being dried out, the team who conducted this study also found that the cysts in the snail were better at surviving desiccation at -70°C than at higher temperatures.

So not only did this study reveal an interesting adaptation that allow these hairworms to complete their life cycle in temperate regions, it also discovered a way of making it easier for scientist to study them in the future. What had originally evolved in these parasites as a way for them to put their life on hold during those freezing winter may now also be the key for researchers to find out more about them.

Reference:
Bolek, M. G., Rogers, E., Szmygiel, C., Shannon, R. P., Doerfert-Schrader, W. E., Schmidt-Rhaesa, A., & Hanelt, B. (2013). Survival of larval and cyst stages of gordiids (Nematomorpha) after exposure to freezing. Journal of Parasitology 99: 397-402.

Special Report: #WAAVP2013 Part II (tongue-biters, eye flukes and parasites gone wild)

This is Part 2 of my report on the 24th International Conference of the World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (WAAVP 2013) I attended last month. If you had missed Part 1 of my report, you can read it here. 

photo credit: Don Ward

At the end of my previous post about WAAVP 2013, I was writing about a whole bunch of parasites from marine animals and I will start this post by continuing with that theme. During Tuesday afternoon, I attended a session on parasites of aquatic animals and the first talk was on parasitic isopods of fish by Nico Smit who happens to be a world-renowned expert on these parasite (he is the also the person who took that infamous photo of the tongue-biter parasite). It turns out that even though the tongue-biter has become a bit of an online celebrity, there is still very little is known about parasitic isopods in general. They seem to be found all over the world and they display different degrees of host specificity relating to latitude, with species in the tropical region being host specialist and those found in more temperature, high latitudinal region being less picky about their host than their tropical relatives.

photo credit:
Maria Sala-Bozano/University of Salford

One of the parasitic crustacean is the infamous tongue-biter, which was the subject of the next talk by Melissa Martin. Her study focused specifically on Cymothoa (the tongue-biter genus) in Australian waters. While most people are intrigued/horrified by their creepy mouth-dwelling antics, it turns out Cymothoa also have an interesting sex life.

The individual that act as the "prosthetic tongue" is always a female and she can produce hundreds of eggs in a brood sac on her belly. The sex of a newly arrived Cymothoa is actually dependent on whether the fish is already carrying another tongue-biter. If there is already a female sitting in the host fish's mouth, the new arrival turns into a male and mates with the female. If another juvenile Cymothoa comes along, the Johnny-come-lately will turn into a male, but he doesn't get in the way of the first male. Instead, he waits in line and if the original female dies, the first male will turn into a female and take her place on the fish's atrophied tongue

Later in the session on parasites of aquatic wildlife Katie O'Dwyer talked about her research was on a species of philophthalmid fluke. The species she is studying is in the same family as a eye fluke that we have previously featured on this blog and is also found in the Otago Harbour. But instead of infecting the mud snail (Zeacumantus subcarinatus) which are abundant on the mudflats of Otago Harbour, this species infects two species of perwinkles - the Banded Periwinkle (Austrolittorina antipodum) and the Brown Periwinkle (Austrolittorina cincta) found on the rocky shores of New Zealand.

Left: Philophthalmid rediae in snail
Right: Philophthalmid larva encysted on a Petri dish

Just like other philophthalmid eye flukes, the species O'Dwyer is looking at also releases free-living larvae that encyst in the environment (see photo on the left). But this one also has an alternate strategy for transmission - encysting in the snail itself and waiting for the snail to be eaten. Her research involves looking at what might be triggering the switch in strategy - so far, the results indicate that it is a combination of environmental and host factors.

During the day, I checked out some posters on thorny-head worms of marlin, trematodes in wrasses of the Great Barrier Reef, worms in dingoes, blood parasites in gobies and coccidians in small mammals. A poster that really caught my attention was one by Amanda Worth, questioning whether the interpretation of altered behaviour in rodents infected with Toxoplasma gondii has simply been a story which has been overblown due to its appeal. It questions whether the role that cats play in the life cycle of T. gondii has been over emphasized seeing as the parasite is capable of being transmitted between hosts just fine without a cat being involved. There's no denying that T. gondii can indeed alter rodent behaviour, but whether it is actually adaptive for the parasite to do so or if it is simply a side effect of the infection pathology should be reevaluated. While T. gondii is often cited as a classic example of parasite host behavioural manipulation, is it because the evidence supporting such an interpretation are really compelling or if it is simply a story that has all the elements that makes it an appealing to us (C'mon, cats AND mind-controlling/zombifying parasites)?

Photo credit: Stefan Kraft

On the last day of the conference, I attended a session on tick borne infections which ended up being really well-attended. There was certainly plenty of tick talks at WAAVP 2013, one of which was from Peter Irwin who was looking at the tick fauna of Australia for potential tick-borne diseases that can infect humans (turns out there are not all that many in Australia - yet) and the possibility of using dogs as sentinels for the presence of Lyme disease in Australia. As a follow-up from all the tick talks, the wildlife parasitology session featured a presentation by Andrea Paparini on tick-borne piroplasm parasites in the platypus. The study Paparini talked about set out to sequence piroplasm parasites from evolutionary unique hosts (such as the duck-billed platypus) to try and sort out the evolutionary relationship within this group of parasite. Apparently piroplasm is very commonly in the platypus (sometimes in conjunction with trypanosome parasites) and they don't seem to cause visible signs of disease to their host.

For a change of pace, Linda Ly presented research on parabasalid flagellates from some Australian termites. Those flagellates are not quite parasites and might actually be mutualists, but they are still very interesting. In a single termite species she was able to identify at least ten brand-new morphotypes of flagellates and considering there are 260 species of native Australian termites in total, those ten are just the tip of the diversity iceberg for termite gut flagellates. This was followed by a talk from Edward Green about some of the morphological features of the springbok louse Linognathus euchorse and the session ended with Mary Shuttleworth presenting her research on the hidden genetic diversity and structure of Cloacina - a genus of parasitic nematode found in swamp wallabies.

While the majority of the talks were on veterinary parasitology, which as I mentioned in my previous post was not really my scene, there were plenty at the conference which held my interest the entire time. This post is only a very small and selective sampling of a fairly well-attended international conference. We will be back with the usual parasite posts next month - I already have a few papers lined up to write about so watch this space!

Special Report: #WAAVP2013 Part I (lancet fluke, dolphin poop and a turtle parasite)

Last month, I attended the 24th International Conference of the World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (WAAVP 2013). While veterinary parasitology is not my usual scene, it was also a joint conference with the annual Australian Society for Parasitologists meeting, and there were also plenty of wildlife and aquatic parasitology on the program that caught my interest. The major themes of this conference included food security and public health in relation to parasites. As this was a big international conference and there were multiple concurrent sessions, the talks that I will be writing about here will be heavily biased towards my own experience and interests - but if any of you reading this also happen have attended WAAVP 2013, feel free to leave your own highlights in the comment section.

The conference reception night kicked off with a public event call "Parasites and Pets, Pets and You" which I live-tweeted (see the storify here). The presentations were about the critters that live in and on people's beloved pet as well as addressing many myths and misconceptions about parasites. The presentation addressed zoonosis and how while it is possible to catch parasites from your pets, you are more likely to catch parasites from the people around you, also that you are more likely to get infected with Toxoplasma gondii from contaminated food than from cats. (On a side note, during the reception night I also picked up some appropriately themed souvenirs - see photo above)

Photo by MONGO

The first day of the conference began off with a plenary session on the history of veterinary parasitology in Australia by Ian Beveridge and Brown Besier. Later in the morning I saw a talk by Melissa Beck on Dicrocoelium dendriticum. For those who don't know, D. dendritium is also known as the lance fluke - the parasite well-known for hijacking the brain of its ant host, causing it to climb to the top of the blade of grass and stay there all night, waiting to be eaten by its next host (a grazing mammal such as a sheep or a deer). Beck's study looked at the age-related pattern of lancer fluke infection in free-ranging wapiti (Cervus candensis) in Alberta, Canada. The study was carried out in Cypress Hills Provincial Park, Canada (so I guess you can say that the ants in that area which are infected with lancet flukes are *[don sunglasses]* - Insane In The Membrane?). She found that the elks seem to become less infected as they get older, with the majority of flukes in the host population found in younger individuals. This may be due to the adult elks having a more robust immune system which prevents them from becoming reinfected by the lancet fluke, or it might even involve some kind of behavioural defence that develop in mature individuals (adult elks learning to avoid eating ant-laden grass?).

Later on that same day, I gave a talk on a study I conducted with my collaborator Amanda Bates on the global pattern of disease outbreaks in aquaculture (which you can read for free here), afterwards I saw a session on the wide variety of parasites that currently plague aquaculture the world over. There was a talk by Ronald Kaminsky on the development of anti-parasite compounds and the salmon lice that are evolving resistance to them. This was followed by Supranee Chinabut who discussed the different types of parasites that infect captive fish in southeast Asia such as monogeneans (ectoparasitic flatworms), parasitic crustaceans, and infectious protozoans (like the startlingly beautiful Trichodina), emphasising the importance of having multiple strategies for dealing with outbreaks of different types of parasites.

In the same session, Kyle McHugh presented a study looking at how introduction of popular angling and aquaculture species such as the large mouth bass and grass carp has brought with them various parasites such as anchor worm and the Asian fish tapeworm that now infest South Africa's own native freshwater fish. Finally Zoe Spiers presented some results from an investigation into the aetiology of oyster winter mortality syndrome - a disease which causes significant loss to oysters farms along the coast of New South Wales, Australia every year. The investigation involved a combination of ecology, histopathology and molecular biology, and while it is commonly believed that oyster winter mortality syndrome is a disease caused by the protozoan parasite Bonamia roughleyi, the result Spiers presented indicates that the symptoms of the disease is not always associated with B. rougleyi and that the actual agent(s) causing winter mortality is still unclear.

Photo by Richard Ling

Keeping the theme underwater, I attend a session the next morning on aquatic parasitology Sarah Catalano (she presented a talk about those parasites at last year's Australian Society for Parasitology meeting) about using the weird and wonderful dicyemid parasites to distinguish different sub-populations of cuttlefish in the waters of South Australia. Dicyemids are very odd parasites that live exclusively in the renal sac of cephalopods, and their exact taxonomic position on the tree of life is currently unknown.

Carlos Hermosilia presented a study which was quite astonishing in its the method of execution. Hermosilia conducts research on the parasites of dolphins but while most studies on dolphin obtain sample from dead stranded dolphins, he chases after parasites from live dolphins, and I mean that quite literally. His methodology involves swimming after dolphins with a tube and scooping up their poop (or vomit). That's right, just like how a responsible dog owner might scoop up after their pooch, but with dolphins - which are powerful swimmers - not to mention dolphin poop comes out in a cloud instead of Fido's neat little turds. Needless to say, chasing down flipper with the aquatic equivalent of a pooper scooper sounds like no mean feat. He found that dolphins harboured all the usual parasitic protozoan and intestinal worms one would expect from a marine mammal, but one unexpected finding was a cymothoid isopod in a dolphin vomit sample. Cymothoids are usually fish parasites (including the infamour "tongue-biter") so it is quite likely that the crustacean might have been from a fish that the dolphin just ate.

Hermosilia's tale of dolphin chasing and poop scooping was followed by a talk on the spirochiid blood fluke of marine turtles by Phoebe Chapman. Spirochiid blood fluke can cause disease in sea turtles and there are 91 species of spirorchiids described worldwide, 30 of which are found in marine hosts.  The species found in sea turtles live in the cardiovascular system of the host where they mate and lay eggs - which is the main cause of disease (at this point it is unknown how the eggs reach the outside environment - there is even a hypothesis that they simply wait for the host to die to be released). The eggs of spirochiid can become lodged in the turtles organs, causing embolism, thrombosis, lung fiborsis, and a long list of other internal injuries. Currently there is no way of detecting the presence of spirochiids in the host while it is still alive and a part of Chapman's research involve developing a method for diagnosing spirochiid infection in live animals.

I will be writing about the rest of Tuesday and the rest of the conference in Part Two of my special report on WAAVP 2013. Stay tuned as there are more to come including tongue-biters, snails and flukes on the rocks, ticks (real ticks, not plastic ones) and parasites of various weird and wonderful wildlife.