Right: Group of South American Fur Seals ( photo by Dick Culbert). Top Left: Intestine of fur seal pup filled with Uncinaria hookworms (from this paper), Bottom Left: The head and mouth of Uncinaria (from this paper) |
But the fur seal hookworm - Uncinaria - breaks that mould. The adult worm lives in the gut of seal pups, and unlike other hookworms that have a lifespan of at least a year or more, the adult stage of Uncinaria doesn't live that long - most seal pups are free of the hookworms within a month or two after the initial infection. But during that time, Uncinaria takes a massive toll on its host and it is one of the leading causes of pup mortality, responsible for 30-70% of pup deaths during breeding seasons. One of the reason for their lethality is their aggressive feeding habit. Unlike other hookworms which are content to simply hang on to the intestinal wall and steadily sip blood, Uncinaria is a glutton that digs deep into the intestinal wall to get their fill and churn out as many eggs as possible during its short life. Their motto is "live fast, die young, leave a whole lot of eggs".
Along with with its short lifespan and unusually aggressive feeding habit, Uncinaria also differs from other hookworm in having a very convoluted life cycle. Unlike human hookworms, seal pups do not acquire their infection from hookworm larvae in the surrounding environment - instead they get it directly from their mother's milk. Once Uncinaria enters the seal pup's gut, it mature into an adult worm within two weeks and starts producing eggs that are shed from infected pups and get spread all over the rookery grounds. After hatching, the hookworm larvae burrow into any seals that they encounter, and migrate to the belly blubber.
Life cycle of Uncinaria, from Fig. 1 of the paper |
So why has Uncinaria evolved to live the way that it does? Well, unlike land-dwelling mammals which can deposit hookworm eggs into the soil for many years and get repeated exposed to new hookworm larvae from their surroundings, Uncinaria does not have those luxuries. Its hosts spend most of their time out at sea and when they do come onto land, they only do so temporarily. The breeding season is the only time when new hosts are around on land for long enough and congregating in sufficient numbers for the parasites to disperse and infect new hosts. Uncinaria only has that brief window of opportunity to complete its life cycle, and to do so successfully means it need to saturate the rookery soil with eggs. And the cost for all those eggs are paid for with the blood of seal pups.
There are a wide range of different factors that determine how harmful a parasite or pathogen is to towards its host. In contrary to popular misconception (or wishful thinking), a well-adapted and successful parasite is not necessarily one that has evolved to live harmoniously with its host, but one that has evolved to get the most out of its host. And under some circumstances, it might mean that the road to successful life cycle completion is one which is paved with dead hosts.
Reference:
Seguel, M., Munoz, F., Perez-Venegas, D., Muller, A., Paves, H., Howerth, E., & Gottdenker, N. (2018). The life history strategy of a fur seal hookworm in relation to pathogenicity and host health status. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife. 7: 251-260
This is fascinating. I’ve always assumed that a successful parasite was one that evolved to disturb its host the least. 30% - 70% mortality is absolutely insane, are there examples of other parasites with such a devastating impact on its host species’ survival rate?
ReplyDeleteWhether the parasite kills the host is predicated on whether it needs the host to stay alive in order to complete their life cycle. In the case of many parasites, it is the interest of the parasite to get the host killed.
DeleteFor example, there are some parasites (such as many that infect waterfleas - Daphnia) which proliferates rapidly inside the host's body but the only way to release the new generation of parasite infective stages is to basically kill the host and come out of the disintegrating cadaver. There are also insect-infecting nematodes where they *have to* first kill the host in order to them to complete their life cycle (called "entomopathogenic nematodes" - I've written about two of those species on this blog).
In other cases, some parasites have complex life cycle where parasite reaches maturity in the gut of a predatory animal, but infects the prey animal during the larval/juvenile stage of their development. In that case, it is in the interest of the parasite for the prey to be eaten by its predator.
In this case, as describe in the post, host mortality is a side-effect of the parasite's life history as an adaptation to living in a mostly aquatic mammal. At the same time, it is so harmful because it can afford to get away with it. Even if the host dies early, it is still a net reproductive gain for the parasite because in the case of this system, the host is only susceptible to the parasite during a brief period of time anyway - functionally speaking, from the parasite's perspective, as resistant host is about as useful as a dead host - so why not make the most of a host while it still can?
Despite common misconception, a successful parasite is not one that does not disturb or live in "harmony" its host - a successful parasite is one that is able to mine the most amount of raw material out of its host for its own reproduction. And sometimes that means inflicting severe or even lethal level of harm. Some parasite does that by diverting nutrient from the host's reproductive organs, effectively castrating it. This is a rather clever way of making the most out of the host but doing so in a sustainable manner, since the host does not need its reproductive organ to stay alive - but evolutionary speaking, the host is functionally dead since it won't be able to reproduce.
Basically, a parasite is as harmful as evolution allows it to get away with.